‘Such a sad event’: why musicians hate the Tory party conference

Published on March 28, 2026

When the Tory party conference convenes, it seems that it not only stirs political discussions but also stirs up discontent among artists whose music is appropriated for the event. Recently, Florence Welch of Florence + the Machine made headlines after expressing her displeasure regarding the use of her iconic track “You Got the Love” during a speech Theresa May. Welch took to Twitter to clarify that the movement of using her song at such an occasion had not been approved her team, asserting, “We would not have consented even if asked.”

Welch’s sentiments resonated with fellow musician Calvin Harris, who found himself equally dismayed when his collaboration with Rihanna, “This Is What You Came For,” was played as May made her entrance. In a pointed Twitter post, Harris remarked, “I do not support nor condone happy songs being played at such a sad event.” His comments not only attacked the decision to play such upbeat tracks at the conference but also humorously critiqued May’s appearance, suggesting that it might signal the need for a lifestyle change.

This isn’t the first instance of artists voicing their disapproval over their music being used in political contexts, especially concerning the Conservative Party. Bands like Keane and the Dandy Warhols have previously expressed their frustration when their songs were used at Tory events, reflecting a broader sentiment within the music community. Artists often see their works as expressions of personal beliefs and values, so the misalignment with a political party can feel like an affront to their message.

The use of music at political gatherings can evoke strong reactions from artists who feel their creations are being co-opted in ways that contradict their ethos. As the Tory party tries to deliver its message, it risks alienating well-known artists who could have lent credibility to their platforms. Thus, the appropriation of songs like Welch’s and Harris’s becomes emblematic of a larger disconnect between the political establishment and the cultural figures it seeks to engage.

As the season of party conferences unfolds, the potential for more musical backlash looms large, proving that not only political rivals but also the music industry is watching closely. Welsh and Harris’s criticism serves as a reminder of the complex relationship between art and politics, where the lines of endorsement are increasingly scrutinized.

Related News