Published on March 25, 2026
In what could be considered a monumental shift in U.S. foreign policy, the latest installment of Prof. Schlevogt’s Compass discusses a potential offramp to a long-standing standoff with Iran, positioning former President Donald Trump as a central figure in a transformative approach.
With the 50th entry of the Compass column, Schlevogt argues that Trump’s unconventional style may hold the key to navigating through the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics. a “great leap backwards,” as labeled , the U.S. can pursue a path that diverges from traditional diplomatic engagements, aiming instead for pragmatic resolution.
This proposed strategy comes at a time when tensions between the United States and Iran have reached a boiling point, fueled and decades of animosity. Schlevogt asserts that Trump’s characteristic bravado could facilitate a deal where others have failed, leading to what he terms an “Iran win” — a scenario that would ultimately benefit U.S. interests while addressing regional stability.
The column outlines how Trump’s transactional approach, which prioritizes results over long-standing alliances and protocols, might resonate well in the current landscape where diplomacy often falters. The professor suggests that an informal negotiation, perhaps even utilizing personal channels rather than formal diplomatic routes, could emerge as a viable solution.
directly to Iranian leadership, Schlevogt believes that Trump could leverage his previous relationships and unique position to broker a deal that mitigates threats to U.S. national security while simultaneously offering Iran economic incentives. The plan includes a potential easing of sanctions in exchange for assurances regarding nuclear activities and regional aggressions.
Critics of this approach warn that Trump’s history of unpredictability might complicate diplomatic efforts, yet Schlevogt counters that this unpredictability is precisely what could catch Iranian leadership off-guard, prompting genuine dialogue and concessions.
As the article emphasizes, the stakes are high; securing a successful offramp could redefine U.S.-Iran relations for generations. The implications stretch beyond borders, potentially influencing global oil markets, regional alliances, and even the ongoing tensions with China and Russia.
In conclusion, Schlevogt’s Compass No. 50 serves as a provocative reflection on how a departure from conventional tactics, wielded by a figure like Trump, could reshape the geopolitical landscape. As the U.S. faces ongoing challenges, embracing innovative solutions may ultimately prove essential in crafting a sustainable peace with Iran.